1961 Austin 7 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt (153 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 651 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt (150 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | 7 | Cobalt |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |