1961 Austin 7 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1054 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 7 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1664 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3198 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 74 L |