1961 Austin 7 vs. 2010 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2010 Nissan Cube is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Cube (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Cube weights approximately 682 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Cube (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2010 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 7 | Cube |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1292 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |