1961 Austin 7 vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1238 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (352 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | 7 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 285 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 85 L |