1961 Austin 7 vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1961 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1353 kg more than 1961 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin 7. (60 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin 7 | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 7 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1963 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 76 L |