1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1961 Austin A 40 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 40 | 60 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 5671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 3230 mm |
