1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1961 Austin A 40 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Holden FX (51 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 210 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | A 40 | FX |
Year Released | 1961 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 68 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2620 mm |