1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1961 Austin A 40 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Studebaker Commander (140 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Studebaker Commander should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 660 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
| Make | Austin | Studebaker |
| Model | A 40 | Commander |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 3673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 90.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 71.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 3070 mm |
