1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1957 Holden FJ
To start off, 1961 Austin A 40 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FJ would be higher. At 2,150 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Holden FJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Holden FJ (59 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1957 Holden FJ should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Holden FJ weights approximately 240 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 1957 Holden FJ | |
| Make | Austin | Holden |
| Model | A 40 | FJ |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2150 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2620 mm |
