1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1960 Chevrolet Corvair
To start off, 1961 Austin A 40 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. At 2,287 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Chevrolet Corvair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Chevrolet Corvair (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Chevrolet Corvair should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chevrolet Corvair weights approximately 400 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 1960 Chevrolet Corvair | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 40 | Corvair |
Year Released | 1961 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |