1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1962 DKW Munga is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 979 cc (3 cylinders), 1962 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 350 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 1962 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | A 40 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 68 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 31 L |
