1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 540 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Austin | Studebaker |
| Model | A 40 | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2980 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |
