1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1967 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1967 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Brougham (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1385 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 1967 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 40 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 2145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 82 L |
