1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1967 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 948 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Austin A 40 (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Suzuki Fronte (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1967 Suzuki Fronte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Austin | Suzuki |
| Model | A 40 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2250 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 66 L |
