1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta
To start off, 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta (301 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta weights approximately 790 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 1968 De Tomaso Mangusta | |
Make | Austin | De Tomaso |
Model | A 40 | Mangusta |
Year Released | 1961 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 90 L |