1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1969 Zastava 850 K is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 948 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Zastava 850 K (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Zastava 850 K should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Zastava 850 K weights approximately 95 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Austin | Zastava |
Model | A 40 | 850 K |
Year Released | 1961 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2010 mm |