1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1984 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1984 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 320 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 1984 Buick Skyhawk | |
| Make | Austin | Buick |
| Model | A 40 | Skyhawk |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2580 mm |
