1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1995 Seat Toledo
To start off, 1995 Seat Toledo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,324 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Seat Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Seat Toledo weights approximately 295 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Seat Toledo (205 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 1995 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 1995 Seat Toledo | |
| Make | Austin | Seat |
| Model | A 40 | Toledo |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2324 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1055 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2480 mm |
