1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 1996 Acura TL | |
| Make | Austin | Acura |
| Model | A 40 | TL |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2840 mm |
