1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1997 Daihatsu Move
To start off, 1997 Daihatsu Move is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 948 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Daihatsu Move (43 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Move should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daihatsu Move, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Daihatsu Move (88 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 1997 Daihatsu Move will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 1997 Daihatsu Move | |
Make | Austin | Daihatsu |
Model | A 40 | Move |
Year Released | 1961 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 847 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 43 HP |
Torque | 68 Nm | 88 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2350 mm |