1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1998 Renault Espider
To start off, 1998 Renault Espider is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Renault Espider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Espider (191 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Espider should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Espider, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Renault Espider (277 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1998 Renault Espider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 1998 Renault Espider | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 40 | Espider |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1998 |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 191 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 277 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
