1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1998 Seat Bolero
To start off, 1998 Seat Bolero is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,799 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Seat Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Seat Bolero (350 HP) has 314 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Seat Bolero should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Seat Bolero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 1998 Seat Bolero | |
| Make | Austin | Seat |
| Model | A 40 | Bolero |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 350 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
