1961 Austin A 40 vs. 1999 Seat Inca Kombi

To start off, 1999 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Seat Inca Kombi (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 275 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications: