1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2000 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Honda Integra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda Integra weights approximately 439 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 2000 Honda Integra | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A 40 | Integra |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2570 mm |