1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2000 Toyota Caserta
To start off, 2000 Toyota Caserta is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2000 Toyota Caserta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Caserta (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Caserta should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Caserta weights approximately 176 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Caserta (140 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Caserta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 2000 Toyota Caserta | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | A 40 | Caserta |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 936 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 55 L |
