1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 188 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Austin | Land Rover |
Model | A 40 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1961 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 222 HP |
Torque | 68 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2550 mm |