1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2002 Toyota F-1
To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2002 Toyota F-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota F-1 (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota F-1 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota F-1 weights approximately 850 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota F-1 (430 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota F-1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 2002 Toyota F-1 | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 40 | F-1 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 430 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1610 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 75 L |