1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A 40 weights approximately 320 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 40 | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Austin | Westfield |
| Model | A 40 | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2320 mm |
