1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2004 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,248 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Fiat Panda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Panda (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Fiat Panda (103 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 2004 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 40 | Panda |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 70.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 78.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 35 L |