1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 40 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2490 mm |