1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 458 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1712 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 623 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 40 | Ram |
Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 8276 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 494 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 691 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 101 mm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 2472 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 3580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 98 L |