1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,874 cc, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (307 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Austin | SsangYong |
Model | A 40 | Rexton |
Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2874 cc |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 307 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1900 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |