1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2006 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,881 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (325 HP @ 2900 RPM) has 289 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (827 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 759 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 2006 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 40 | Ram |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 5881 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 325 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 827 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 129 L |