1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2006 Nissan Interstar
To start off, 2006 Nissan Interstar is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Interstar (112 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Interstar should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Interstar (290 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Interstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 2006 Nissan Interstar | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Interstar |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 100 L |