1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2008 Chevrolet Impala

To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (233 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.

Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Impala (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Austin A 40 2008 Chevrolet Impala
Make Austin Chevrolet
Model A 40 Impala
Year Released 1961 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 948 cc 3506 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 36 HP 233 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 68 Nm 325 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 3670 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2220 mm 2810 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 64 L