1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (316 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 68 Nm | 316 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |