1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Rabbit
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Rabbit is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,480 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volkswagen Rabbit is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volkswagen Rabbit weights approximately 590 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Rabbit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 2008 Volkswagen Rabbit | |
Make | Austin | Volkswagen |
Model | A 40 | Rabbit |
Year Released | 1961 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 55 L |