1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2009 Renault Megane

To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.

Because 1961 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Austin A 40 2009 Renault Megane
Make Austin Renault
Model A 40 Megane
Year Released 1961 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 948 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 36 HP 112 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 68 Nm 152 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 64.6 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 80.5 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 3670 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 2050 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 60 L