1961 Austin A 40 vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (238 HP) has 202 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40.
Because 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (410 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 40 | 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 40 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1961 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 238 HP |
Torque | 68 Nm | 410 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |