1961 Austin A 55 vs. 1968 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1968 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jeep CJ5 (59 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 55. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A 55 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1968 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1968 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Austin A 55. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 55. (111 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1968 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 55 | 1968 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 55 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 111 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2060 mm |