1961 Austin A 55 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 491 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 55. (51 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 55.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 55. (111 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 55.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Austin A 55 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
Make Austin Cadillac
Model A 55 CTS-V
Year Released 1961 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1488 cc 6162 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 51 HP 542 HP
Engine RPM 4350 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 111 Nm 550 Nm
Torque RPM 2100 RPM 6200 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4870 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 68 L