1961 Austin A 60 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1961 Austin A 60 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 60 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 60 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 79 L |
