1961 Austin A 60 vs. 1962 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1962 Isuzu Minx is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Isuzu Minx (62 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Isuzu Minx should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A 60 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Austin A 60 (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1961 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 60 | 1962 Isuzu Minx | |
| Make | Austin | Isuzu |
| Model | A 60 | Minx |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 62 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 75 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2440 mm |
