1961 Austin A 60 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 935 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 60 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 60 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 79 L |
