1961 Austin A 60 vs. 1965 Peugeot 204
To start off, 1965 Peugeot 204 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1965 Peugeot 204. (52 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1965 Peugeot 204. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A 60 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1965 Peugeot 204. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Peugeot 204, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Austin A 60 (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Peugeot 204. (82 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1961 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Peugeot 204.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 60 | 1965 Peugeot 204 | |
Make | Austin | Peugeot |
Model | A 60 | 204 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1130 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 52 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 82 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 64 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 42 L |