1961 Austin A 60 vs. 1982 Buick Century
To start off, 1982 Buick Century is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Century (110 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60.
Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Buick Century (197 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 1982 Buick Century will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 60 | 1982 Buick Century | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 60 | Century |
Year Released | 1961 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 197 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1364 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2662 mm |