1961 Austin A 60 vs. 1996 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1996 Mercury Villager is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 680 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 60 | 1996 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Austin | Mercury |
Model | A 60 | Villager |
Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 149 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2860 mm |