1961 Austin A 60 vs. 1996 Volkswagen Caddy

To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volkswagen Caddy (63 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A 60 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1996 Volkswagen Caddy.

Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Volkswagen Caddy (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Volkswagen Caddy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.

Compare all specifications: