1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2000 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,910 cc, 2000 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Fiat Siena weights approximately 180 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60.
Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2000 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Austin A 60 | 2000 Fiat Siena | |
| Make | Austin | Fiat |
| Model | A 60 | Siena |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1910 cc |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1300 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 65 L |
