1961 Austin A 60 vs. 2002 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2002 Fiat Doblo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Fiat Doblo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Fiat Doblo (101 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Doblo should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Fiat Doblo weights approximately 200 kg more than 1961 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Fiat Doblo (200 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Fiat Doblo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Austin A 60 | 2002 Fiat Doblo | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 60 | Doblo |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 101 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 90.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 18.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 60 L |